HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15612 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead District Selection Committee for Aganwadi Worker as respondent no. 5. 2. Heard Sri Satya Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that pursuant to an advertisement issued on 15.03.2024 recruitment exercise stood undertaken on the post of Aganwadi Karyakatri and the writ petitioner being fully eligible and qualified applied for the same on 17.03.2024, however, the writ petitioner due to bone fide reasons did not mention the centre, however, on 29.03.2025 a select list came to be published but the name of the writ petitioner had not been shown. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the said discrepancy does not go to the root of the matter and the claim of the writ petitioner is entitled to be considered and there are vacancies lying vacant. 4. Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits once it is the fault of the writ petitioner that she did not fill up the centre as alleged by him then she has to face the music, according to him, now selections have been concluded and appointment orders have already been issued and in absence of the selected candidates the present petition may not be maintainable. 5. Having heard the submission so made across the bar, in the opinion of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad, Satya Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Angeeta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the Court, no positive mandamus can be issued, however, it is open for the writ petitioner to approach the fifth respondent, District Selection Committee for Recruitment of Aganwadi Worker filing a comprehensive representation along with a self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order by 14.11.2025 and on the said motion, the fifth respondent shall consider the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. 6. With the said observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 17, 2025 Rajesh WRIA No. 15612 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad