Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19392 (GAU)

DIPCHAN AGRAHARI BONIA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3101/2025 · 2025-09-25

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210182025 2025:GAU-AS:13559 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3101/2025 DIPCHAN AGRAHARI BONIA AND ANR S/O SRI KUNJALAL AGRAHARI BONIA R/O VILL- NO. 1 CHAKALIA, P.O. CHAKALIA, P.S. MORAN, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-785675 2: BHORAT AGRAHARI BONIA S/O SRI KUNJALAL AGRAHARI BONIA R/O VILL- NO. 1 CHAKALIA P.O. CHAKALIA P.S. MORAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-78567 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, SR. ADV, MR K J SAIKIA,MR. P BORDOLOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor seeking regular bail in connection with Moran P.S. Case NO. 76/2025 under Sections 61(2)/109(1)/108/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. He was arrested on 22.07.2025. 3. The petitioner No. 1 and No.2 stated to be the brother-in-law and husband of the deceased. The allegation in the FIR is that the names of the persons including the present accused person conspired and attempted to kill the informant’s daughter. 4. The case diary as called for has received. It is submitted by the learned Addl. P.P. that the materials revealed by the investigation lend support to the allegations in the FIR. It is also submitted that the materials which have been collected by the investigation show that both the present petitioners were involved in inflicting all sorts of torture upon the deceased. 5. The statements of some of the relevant witnesses have been placed before the Court by way of the case diary. Page No.# 3/3 6. I have gone through the statements and find force in the contention of the prosecution. Considering the nature of the case, the bail petition stands rejected at this stage. 7. Return back the case diary 8. The bail petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant