Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19392 (CHH)

KHUSHBU SAHU v. SHRAWAN KUMAR SAHU

WP227/420/2023 · 2025-07-20

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:34678 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 420 of 2023 1 - Khushbu Sahu D/o Shrawan Sahu Aged About 27 Years W/o Nishant, Aged About 27 Years, Occupation House Wife, R/o Darri Para Police Chowki Manipur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh Present R/o House No. 526 Ward No. 03, Ganesh Chowk, Nehru Nagar Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shrawan Kumar Sahu S/o Late Gulabchand Sahu Aged About 49 Years R/o Darri Para Police Chowki Manipur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh 2 - Antu Sahu S/o Late Gulabchand Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Darri Para Police Chowki Manipur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh 3 - Subhash Sahu S/o Gulabchand Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Darri Para Police Chowki Manipur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Mahesh Prasad Sahu S/o Late Gulabchand Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Darri Para Police Chowki Manipur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh SMT NIRMALA RAO 2 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Prachi Singh, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Shri Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Pramod Shrivastava, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21.07.2025 1. It is contended by Ms. Prachi Singh and Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocates appearing for petitioner/ plaintiff and defendants No.1 to 4/ respondents, respectively, that the parties are exploring possibility of settlement and the matter is fixed for hearing on 13th August, 2025. 2. Taking into consideration the fact that there is a possibility of settlement between the parties, the petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner/ plaintiff would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi