GUDDU SRIVASTAV v. BAREILLY NAGAR NIGAM AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/35196/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193918 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193918 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35196 of 2025 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Mr. P.H. Vashishtha, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, respondent no.2 (the Nagar Nigam) issued notice dated 1st September, 2025 for eviction and thereafter demolition of his client's shop. He seeks interference. He refers to order dated 17th September, 2025 of co-ordinate Bench in disposing of Writ C no.32595 of 2025 (Anoop Saxena Alias Anoop Kumar Alias Anoop Kumar Saxena Vs. State of U.P.). He submits, his client's case for relief is covered by said order.
2. Mr. Shyam Mani Shukla, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 (the Nagar Nigam). On query he submits, the case is covered.
3. We see no necessity to notice proforma respondent no.3 since the contesting parties are ad-idem on order dated 17th September, 2025 (supra) covering the case. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of said order. Direction made therein is deemed to have been made herein, as applicable. October 14, 2025 Salim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : P.H. Vashishtha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shyam Mani Shukla
(Arindam Sinha,J.)
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) Guddu Srivastav .....Petitioner(s) Bareilly Nagar Nigam And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad