APHC010270942008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19931 OF 2008 Between: Muthyala Padu Grampanchayat. Rep. by its Sarpanch. Smt. Muddureddei Venkata Subbamma W/o. Raghava Reddy Pentapadu Village, Hamlet of Muthyalapadu, Chillakur Mandal, Nellore District. R/o. ...Petitioner AND 1. The District Collector Sri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore, District, Nellore. 2. The District Panchayat Officer Nellore Distirct, Nellore. 3. The Panchayat Secretary Muthyala Padu Grampanchayat, Chillakur Mandal, Nellore District. 4. The Mutyalapadu Water Users Association Rep by its. President, Sri. Varidhireddy Rama Mohana Reddy, S/o. Venkata Ramana Paricherlavaripalem Village, Chillakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Reddy, R/o. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue a Writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd the High Court may be respondent in passing the impugned order dt. 26-08-2008 is illegal, arbitrary, malafide contrary to the objects of G.O.Ms.No. 76 Pt. & RD (Rules) Dept. Dt. 13-03- 2001 and violation of principles of natural justice by setting aside the same and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 1 auction of the harvesting / felling of Babul trees raised in Muthyalapadu Tank in 58 ha. in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2008rWPMP 26017 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to proceed with the auction by suspending impugned order dt. 26-08-2008 issued by the 2nd respondent disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI M SUDHIR SC FOR ZPP AND GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI V MALLIK The Court made the following order: to 3 to proceed with the the pending & ,MPP, APHC010270942008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19931/2008 Between: 1.MUTHYALA PADU GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SARPANCH, SMT. MUDDUREDDEI VENKATA SUBBAMMA W/0. RAGHAVA REDDY, R/0. PENTAPADU VILLAGE, HAMLET OF MUTHYALAPADU, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SRI POTTI SREERAMULU NELLORE, DISTRICT, NELLORE. 2.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER NELLORE DISTIRCT, NELLORE. 3. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY MUTHYALA PADU GRAMPANCHAYAT, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4.THE MUTYALAPADU WATER USERS ASSOCIATION REP BY ITS, PRESIDENT, SRI. VARIDHIREDDY RAMA MOHANA REDDY, S/0. VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, R/0. PARICHERLAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the impugned order dt. 26-08-2008 is illegal, arbitrary, malafide contrary to the objects of G.O.Ms.No. 76 Pt. & RD (Rules) Dept. Dt. 13-03- 2001 and violation of principles of natural justice by setting aside the and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to proceed with the auction of the harvesting / felling of Babul trees raised in Muthyalapadu Tank in 58 ha. in the interst of justice and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 26017 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to proceed with the auction by suspending the impugned order dt. 26-08-2008 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ACHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2.M PRAKASA RAO 3.VMALLIK 4.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV same The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has submitted a letter in the Registry to the same effect. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. A Chandraih Naidu Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. M Sudhir SC for ZPP, MPP, and Gram Panchayat [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. V Mallik Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 19931 OF 2008 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS