Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193909 (MAD)

Aiyapillai v. Gopi

CRP/5163/2025 · 2025-10-27

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP.No.5163 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.No.5163 of 2025 Aiyapillai ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Gopi 2. Vanitha 3. Muthulakshmi 4. The Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Regisrar, Nannilam – 610 105. ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the learned Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur to take up the plaint in O.S.SR.No.3975 of 2025 on the file and number the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Arunbabu For Respondent : Mr.N.Muthuvel, Government Advocate for R4 ORDER The petitioner challenges the docket order of rejection of plaint in O.S.SR.No.3975 of 2025 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.5163 of 2025 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Trial Court has erroneously proceeded to reject the plaint summarily even at the institution of the suit which is contrary to the ratio laid down by the Madurai Bench of this Court in Selvaraj and Ors Vs. Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant India Limited and Ors. reported in 2021 (4) CTC 539. 3. I have also gone through the docket order of rejection of the plaint on 07.07.2025. 4. The Trial Court ought to have numbered the suit since if it is otherwise in order and should not have gone into the merits of the relief sought for in the plaint. The Court is only performing a ministerial function at the time of registration of the suit and cannot enter into the judicial domain to invoke the provisions of Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C., unilaterally and reject the plaint. It is always open to the defendants, if any avenue is open to them, to seek rejection of the plaint, if the plaint is not properly framed and necessary reliefs have not been sought for and it is not for the Court to reject the plaint even at the time of numbering of the suit. The order is improper and liable to be set aside. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.5163 of 2025 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision petition is allowed. The order in O.S.SR.No.3975 of 2025 on the file of the learned Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur, is set aside. The trial Court is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. No costs. 27.10.2025 Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes/No vum To 1. The Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Regisrar, Nannilam – 610 105. 2. The Subordinate Court, Thiruvarur. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.5163 of 2025 P.B. BALAJI,J. vum C.R.P.No.5163 of 2025 27.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis