PURUSHOTTAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT LUCKNOW
ABAIL/587/2022 · 2025-10-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 587 of 2022 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. However, Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for CBI is present.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 140 of 2018 under section 147, 323, 394, 504, 342, 506 I.P.C. Castes and Atrocities) and Section 3(1)X of Schedule Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Act 1989 (Amendment 2015) and Section 7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act, Police Station Shivrajpur, District Kanpur Nagar with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial.
3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2022, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed.
5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. October 10, 2025/S.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sharda Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Purushottam Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad