Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35871 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Parvesh Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Satya Prakash Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 2, the Additional District Magistrate (F & R), Mathura, District Mathura, to decide the Case No. 3071 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. D202301500003071), [Ramesh Chand Vs. Smt. Kamlesh Devi and Others], under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Attention is also drawn to Rule 126(6) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, wherein it is provided that the Collector shall endeavour to conclude the enquiry for cancellation of allotment, under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a period of three months from the date of issuance of notice. Accordingly, the petitioner, by way of the present petition has sought for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Ramesh Chand .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 23 Others .....Respondent(s)
proceedings to be concluded expeditiously. Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and the counsel for the respondent Gram Sabha, have no objection if the proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties and keeping in view the mandate providing a period for one year for a suit to be decided, as noted above, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 14, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 35871 of 2025 2 (Dr.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad