HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15804 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Kalpana Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Ms. Himkanya Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the father of the writ petitioner was a Police Constable, who expired, and the writ petitioner is the daughter, however, the mother of the writ petitioner had remarried. The writ petitioner claims payment of gratuity, funds, insurance and other retiral dues. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided at the first instance by Respondent no.2 after considering the competing claim, if any. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2, Superintendent of Police, Mainpuri by 07.11.2025, who shall on the said motion proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. In case, the second respondent is of the opinion that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided by any other authority, then the papers be transmitted to that authority after due communication to the writ petitioner. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kalpana Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Shivangi Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad