APHC010271252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESFT AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAP^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 744 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 04.03.2025 in W.P.No.5458 of 2025 on the file of the High Court.-^ Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Vaddeswaram, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupati West Police Station, Tirupati District ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS- AND D. Vamsi Krishna, S/o D. Muni Reddy, R/o. 131114, P. K Street, Tirupati, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati District, currently residing at Door No. 9, Star Hills Residency, Flat No 401, Sreeram Nagar, Manikonda, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Order of the Learned Single Judge in suspend the operation of the W.P.No.5458 of 2025 dated; 04.03.2025. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent: SRI PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR R^DDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC010271252025 Bench Sr.No:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 17 [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 744 of 2025 The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Appellants Vs. D Vamsi Krishna ...Respondent itickicicic-kicick Advocate for Appellants GP for Home Advocate for Respondent Mr. Papudippu Sashidar Reddy CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 4*” July, 2025 DATE PC : The present appeal is covered by our judgment rendered in G. Swamy Naidu V. State of Andhra Pradesh [W.A.No.849 of 2023 decided on 28.11.2023] following the judgment of the Apex Court in Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and others {2017 5 SCC 533] wherein it has been held that a writ appeal is not maintainable against the judgment rendered by a single Bench passed in exercise of its criminal jurisdiction. 2 HG & RC, J WA_744_2025 In the light of the above, the present Writ Appeal is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /f. SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Papudippu Sashidar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC],— 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT^^ 3. Two CD Copies. ssb ■X HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 JUDGMENT WA No. 744 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS