Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193885 (ALL)

PRIYANSHU JAISWAL v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35022/2024 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35022 of 2024 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- "a) issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of quo warranto against respondent no.3 by quashing and setting aside impugned appointment order dated 21.12.2023 issued from the office respondent no.-2, appointing Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh IFS-2015 (DFO Sonbhadra) as Member Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board Lucknow and accordingly directing the respondent no.3 to vacate the office of Member Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board Lucknow with immediate effect. b) issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus Direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 to issue fresh advertisement calling for application form eligible candidates for appointed to the post of Member Secretary in accordance with Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (Conditions of Service of Chairman and Member Secretary) Rules, 2021." 2. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udayan Nandan Priyanshu Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) revised call. Though, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Shri Udayan Nandan, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 are present, as such, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. October 10, 2025 Anurag/- WRIC No. 35022 of 2024 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad