Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19388 (AP)

P V VENKATANAGAPRASAD v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP(PIL)/110/2025 · 2025-07-08

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4. APHC010270762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AWIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WP(PIL) NO: 110 OF 2025 Between: P V Venkatanagaprasad, S/o Ramarao Aged 39 years Occ. Pvt. Employee R/o Dr.No.4/28, Veerapunayunipalle Cuddapah Adhaar No. 459182680807 Bank Account No 1407155000226611, Karur Vysya Bank Limited, Proddatur ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of School Education Department, Venkatadri Towers, Amaravati Guntur. 3. The District Educational Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh 4. The Mandal Education Officer, O/o Mandal Education Office Kamalapuram, Kadapa 5. The Sri Narayana E.M School, Rep. By its Correspondent, Kondayapalli (V), Pedda Cheppali Kamalapuram, YSR Kadapa ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents to the extent of granting permission and recognition to 5th respondent school within the radius of 30 meters from a Mandal Praja Parishad (Government) school violating the rules prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.1, Education (PS.2) Department, dt 01-01-1994 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper against principles of Natural Justice and (i) Direct the respondents more particularly 3rd respondent not to grant any permission/ recognition for establishment of 5th respondent school as per G.O.Ms.No.1, Education (PS.2) Department, dt 01-01- 1994 (ii) Direct respondents to make a proper inquiry/ investigation against 5th respondent School. the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to stay the granting of any permission/ recognition for establishment of 5th respondent school as per G.O.Ms.No.1, Education (PS.2) Department, dt;01-01- 1994 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following order: Bench Sr.No;-2 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010270762025 WP(PIL) NO: 110 of 2025 ...Petitioner P. V. Venkatanagaprasad Vs. ...Respondents The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ********** Sri Pamarthy Rathnakar Learned Government Pleader for School Education Advocate for Petitioner Advocate for Respondents CORAM -.THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 9th July 2025 ..K f'*: PC : Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition (PIL). Accordingly, the Writ Petition (PIL) is dismissed as withdrawn. No order 2. as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. OneCCto Sri. Pamarthy Rathnakar Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for School Education, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies gsc HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025 ORDER WP(PIL) NO. 110 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE WP(PIL) AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS