Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193860 (ALL)

AMIT VIKRAM TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15788/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15788 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ankit Mishra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed on the post of Sub-Inspector in UP Police and post-appointment, he was sent on training, however, he has been paid stipend and not the salary for the training period. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the writ petitioner. 4. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the writ petitioner has already represented the matter, and he may press his representation before the competent authority, i.e. Respondent no.3. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3 by 07.11.2025, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Mishra, Vikas Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Amit Vikram Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad