HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12963 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (a) Issue an order or direction, directing the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), F.T.C, Prayagraj to decide the injunction application (Paper No.6C) dated 30.07.2024 filed by the plaintiff-petitioner in Original Suit No. 986 of 2024, Sweta Singh and others Vs. Sarfaraj and others, expeditiously pending before him or within the stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), F.T.C, Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 29, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shobhit Jaiswal, Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sweta Singh .....Petitioner(s) Sarfaraj Alias Chand Mohammad And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad