1 APHC010270272011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4404/2011 Between: Namburi Saloman ...PETITIONER AND The Govt Of Ap Rep By Its Prl Secretary And 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PITCHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. M.CHALAPATHI SC For Nagarjuna University The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the letters 230/U.E.I/A1/2010-3, dt 30.8.2010 and 230/U.E.A1/2010-4, dt 21.01.2011 of the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal stating that minimum time scale employees are not entitled to get HRA and CCA 2 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 21 of the constitution of India and provisions of AP Universities Act and Rules made thereon and consequently set aside the same by holding that the petitioner and other employees are entitled of HRA and CCAs and pass...” 2. Heard Mr M.Pitchaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr M.Chalapathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. As seen from the proceeding sheet, this Court on 23.02.2011 while issuing ‘Notice before Admission’ has passed an interim order that the 3rd respondent university may not give effect to the impugned order. 4. On hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has furnished a copy of the written instructions issued by the 3rd respondent before this Court. As per the written instructions, the petitioner retired from the University on 31.12.2021 and the respondents are paying the HRA and CCA to the petitioner along with other time scale NMR’s as per the G.O.Ms.No.119 Higher Education (UE.I) Department, dated 16.02.2013. 5. Mr M.Pitchaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim orders of this Court, dated 23.02.2011, the respondents has not given effect to the impugned order and they are paying HRA and CCA to the petitioner. Hence, in view of the same no cause survives in the present Writ Petition and it may be closed. 6. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Dated : 04.04.2025 TM 4 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO W.P.No.4404 of 2011 Date: 04.04.2025 TM