Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193839 (ALL)

PHOOL CHANDRA SAHU v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/35281/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35281 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to not to create the hindrance in the construction work raised by the petitioner in the property/ house legally owned and possessed by the petitioner." (2) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the application dated 5.5.2025 made by the petitioner within specified time to be fixed by this Court by passing speaking and reasoned order." It is contended by learned Standing Counsel that the dispute between the parties are pending before the trial court and hence he may seek appropriate remedy by moving appropriate application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 2 A of the Code of Civil Procedure. In view of above, we see no justification to grant indulgence in the matter. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to record. October 14, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. ( Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Phool Chandra Sahu .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad