Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19383 (RAJ)

AZAD AHMED S/O MUSTAQ AHMED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6601/2025 · 2025-06-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23291] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6601/2025 Azad Ahmed S/o Mustaq Ahmed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Mahanandpur, Dodya, Police Station Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 17/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.253/2024, registered with the Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 3(5) & 308(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case alleging that he provided the QR code for transfer of money. Counsel further submits that neither any money has been transferred in the account of the accused petitioner nor there is any allegation against him for receiving any amount in cash. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2025, therefore, he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail [2025:RJ-JP:23291] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6601/2025] application. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner so also the allegation against the petitioner and more particularly the fact that there is nothing on record that any amount was given or transferred in the account of the accused petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/146