Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193821 (ALL)

LALITA PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3678/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3678 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that a Complaint Case No. 51 of 2023 (Shanti Yadav Vs. Devesh Real State), under Section-138 of N.I. Act was filed by the applicant and the said case is still pending. 3. Learned counsel has submitted that the applicant is an old person aged about 84 years and his money was duped by respondent no.2. The applicant is running short of money. He is not even able to meet out his daily expenses as well as the expenses he has to incur upon his treatment. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Trial Court to decide the above case as expeditiously as possible so that he may be able to seek the result of case during his lifetime. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the learned Magistrate is directed to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment. 5. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 13, 2025 Mukesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhaiya Lal Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Lalita Prasad Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad