Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193818 (ALL)

PRAMOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/36494/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36494 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Zafeer Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.205 of 2025, under Sections 140(1), 61 B.N.S., Police Station- Jewar, District Gautam Buddh Nagar. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the statement of abductee Hansraj, the role of the applicant is that he has also accompanied with Puttan to take the family of abductee to his house. It is further submitted that from CCTV footage, it is clear that alleged BMW is belong to Puttan, the applicant simply accompanied with Puttan. He further submitted that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has explained the criminal history of one case in para 38 of the affidavit and he is languishing in jail since 28.06.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Zafeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Pramod Kumar involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 9. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 10. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. October 17, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 36494 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad