Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010209912015 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/588/2015 DILIP KUMAR DAS S/O LT. NARAYAN CHANDRA DAS R/O VILL- DALIBARI DADARA, DIST. KAMRUP R, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMETN OF AGRICULTURE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE CHAIRMAN THE ASSAM STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD RAMKRISHNA MISSION ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE ASSAM STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD RAMKRISHNA MISSION ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 4:SRI LAKHYA DHAR SAHARIA 5:SRI ANIL CHANDRA BAISHYA 6:NASIRUDIN KHAN CHOUDHURY Page No.# 2/3 7:MD. ANUWAR HUSSAIN 8:MRS. RUMA CHOUDHURY THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 5 6 7 and 8 TO BE SERVED THROUGH THE 3RD RESPONDENT I.E. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.U K NAIR, MR.H K DAS,MR.A CHETRY Advocate for the Respondent : MR.P KATAKIR-8, MR. N J GOGOI,MR.K BHATTACHARJEE,MS.R BEGUM(R-8),SC, AGRI. DEPARTMENT BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 15.05.2025 Heard Mr. A. Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G. Bora, learned standing counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. Mr. Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has lost contact with the petitioner and as such, he has no up-to-date instruction in this matter. 3. At this stage, Mr. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has produced a letter of the Administrative Officer, Assam State Agricultural Marketing Board addressed to Senior Advocate, Gauhati High Court, dated 28.11.2017, and submits that the petitioner, Sri Dilip Kumar Das had been promoted to the post of Assistant Marketing Officer, vide No. ASAMB/Admn/996/Pt-II/2017-18/12, dated 14.07.2017, considering his Page No.# 3/3 reservation quota. Mr. Gogoi further submits that as per his instruction, the petitioner retired on 31.03.2022, and as such, Mr. Gogoi submits that the prayer made in this petition has already been complied with and this matter becomes infructuous, and as such, the same may be closed. 4. Mr. Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the instruction so placed before this Court today and submitted by Mr. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, this petition may be closed. 5. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, I have carefully gone through the petition and the documents placed on record, and also perused the letter dated 28.11.2017. 6. Perusal of the letter dated 28.11.2017, indicates that the petitioner, Sri Dilip Kumar Das had been promoted to the post of Assistant Marketing Officer, vide No. ASAMB/Admn/996/Pt-II/2017-18/12, dated 14.07.2017, considering his reservation quota, and the petitioner retired on 31.03.2022 from the said post, and that being so, the prayer made in this petition has already been complied with and as such, this matter becomes infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed. 7. The letter dated 28.11.2017, produced before this Court, shall be part of the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant