Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19375 (CHH)

RAJESH KUMAR SAHU v. PURAN LAL SAHU

MAC/824/2018 · 2025-03-08

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11623 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Member Lok Adalat: Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate. MAC No. 824 of 2018 1. Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Sahdev Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Bus Stand Rajim Tahsil And District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Rohni Sahu W/o Rajesh Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Bus Stand Rajim Tahsil And District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants. versus 1. Puran Lal Sahu S/o Shri Natheram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village - Atarmara, Thana - Panduka District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ( Non Applicant No. 1 ) ( Driver ), District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh. 2. Makhan Lal Sahu S/o Shri M.R. Sahu, R/o Village - Atarmara, Thana - Panduka District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ( Non Applicant No. 2 ) ( Driver ), Chhattisgarh. 3. National Insurance Comp. Ltd, Divisional Office, Ii Nd Flor Mobin Mahal In Front Of Shahid Smarak Bhawan, Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ( Non Applicant - 3 ), District : Raipur, Chhattisgar Respondent(s) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellants : Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AWARD (8-3-2025) 2 1. The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute which is subject matter of the appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No.3/Insurance Company shall pay Rs. 1,80,000/- (Rupees one lakh eighty thousand only) by way of compensation in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal to the appellants within 60 days from today, otherwise interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, shall also be payable till its realization of the additional amount of compensation. 2. It is directed that total enhanced amount of Rs. 1,80,000/- shall be paid to the claimant/appellants through transfer of fund in their bank account. 3. A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award passed today, forthwith. Sd/- Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) (Ashok Kumar Verma) Judge - Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.03.10 12:09:14 +0530