HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35642 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Nitin Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Amrish Sahai, learned counsel for the bank and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. At the outset, it has been brought to our notice that 'secured asset' has already been auctioned. 3. In view of the above fact and the operating law on the subject, interference claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution is declined. 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioners to avail their statutory remedies in accordance with law. October 13, 2025 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitin Sharma, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Amrish Sahai, C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Bal Mukund Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad