Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
--1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 652 of 2024
----
1. Md. Naimuddin, aged about 61 years. 2. Abdul Halim @ Md. Halim, aged about 51 years. 3. Md. Khalimuddin, aged about 48 years. All sons of Late Abdul Sakur. 4. Md. Kamran Ansari, aged about 51 years. 5. Md. Imran Ansari, aged about 36 years. Both sons of Late Abdul Samad. 6. Md. Junaid Alam, aged about 36 years. 7. Abdul Kadir, aged about 31 years. Both sons of late Ekramul Haque. 8. Md. Moinuddun, aged about 73 years. 9. Md. Muztaba, aged about 69 years. 10. Md. Mokhtar, aged about 51 years. All sons of Late Md. Suleman Ansari
11. Sufaida Khatoon, aged about 41 years, wife of Late Abdul Wasid
12. Md. Shahid, aged about 24 years. 13. Md. Mujahid, aged about 13 years (minor), being represented by his mother, namely, Sufaida Khatoon as a legal and natural guardian. Both sons of Late Abdul Wasid. 14. Abdul Barik, aged about 36 years, son of Late Md. Suleman. All residents of Village-Sithio, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi
.... Petitioners -- Versus –
1. Umar Ali, son of Late Mobarak Hussain, resident of Village-Sethio, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. Smt. Purnima Senapati, wife of Sanjay Kumar Senapati, resident of Village-Hawai Nagar, Road No. 13, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. 3. Sanjay Kumar Senapati, son of Late Basudeo Senapati, resident of Village-Hawai Nagar, Road No. 13, P.O.- Hinoo, P.S.-
--2--
Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. 4. Diman Ghosh, son of Late Parshunram Ghose,resident of Road No. 6, House No. 15, Kilburn Colony, P.O.-Hinoo, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. .... Respondents
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents :-
---- 03/08.01.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for restoration of C.M.P. No. 320/2023, which has been dismissed for default on 28.06.2024, on account of non-prosecution. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter was listed on 28.06.2024 at Serial No. 15 before the Court and, moreover, the case was not marked, as such no body appeared. 4. In view of the above submission and looking to the averments made in this petition, sufficient cause is made out to restore this C.M.P. As such C.M.P. No. 320 of 2023 is restored to its original file. 5.
Accordingly, the present C.M.P. Stands disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Rashmi/