MATLOOB URF PAPPU AND 3 OTHERS v. UPAR UPJILADHIKARI SADAR, TEHSIL SADAR AND 21 OTHERS
WRIC/36204/2025 · 2025-10-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36204 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No. 1, the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, District Prayagraj to decide the Case No. 00053 of 2019, computerized case no. T202002030600053 (Matloob alias Pappu vs. Akhatar alias Teni and others), under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned. The delay in disposal of the case is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner. Attention is also drawn to para 458 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, wherein it is provided that the court concerned is to make an endeavour to decide a suit within a period of one year from the date of its institution. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to respondent no. 1, the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, District Prayagraj, to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Tripathi, Gaurav Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Matloob Urf Pappu And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Upar Upjiladhikari Sadar, Tehsil Sadar And 21 Others .....Respondent(s)
observation that the respondent No. 1 would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of one year without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties and keeping in view the mandate providing a period of one year for a suit to be decided, as noted above, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Imroz WRIC No. 36204 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad