SURESH CHAND YADAV S/O SHRI TANURAM YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/161/2025 · 2025-05-28
Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19371 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19371 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22369-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 161/2025 Suresh Chand Yadav S/o Shri Tanuram Yadav, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Parth City, Nari Ka Bas, Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director, General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
3. Station House Officer, Police Station, Kalwar, Jaipur City (West), Jaipur.
4. Payal Yadav D/o Suresh Chand Yadav, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Parth City, Nari Ka Bas, Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur.
5. Rohit Yadav S/o Tejpal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gudha Jalsu Village. Sirsili P.s Chomu District Jaipur Through S.h.o., Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khurshid Ahmed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG & Ms. Neha Goyal Ms. Kavita Sharma, CI – SHO, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 28/05/2025 Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has submitted factual report dated 27.05.2025, which is taken on record.
[2025:RJ-JP:22369-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-161/2025] As per the said report dated 27.05.2025, corpus “P” has been recovered. She submitted an application before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (West) to the effect that she solemnized marriage with respondent No.5 and sought protection from her family members. As per the Aadhaar Card of the detenue, her date of birth is 01.01.2006. In this view of the matter and the corpus being major, she was sent with respondent No.5 as per her own desire, at the place where she wanted to go. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the report dated 27.05.2025, this habeas corpus petition has been rendered infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Payal/Sudeepak/52