M/S SHREE NATH HOTEL v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35523/2025 · 2025-10-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193709 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193709 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35523 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned panel counsel for the respondent as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for direction to respondent no. 1 and 3 to make payment of Rs. 52,98,994 with interest out of which Rs. 7,63, 200/- has stood paid to the petitioner. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that there is no dispute regarding amount claimed by the petitioner as is reflected on the letter written by Principal, Government Medical College, Jhansi dated 18th September, 2024 to the Commissioner Administration, Jhansi in which three figures found in favour of the petitoner for a sum of Rs. 28,08,250/-, 2,10,000/- and 15,17,250 totalling amount of Rs. 45,35,500/-. Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent states that the petitioner may be directed to move fresh application before respondent no. 3, who shall ensure that amount is released by respondent no. 4. In the circumstances, petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make fresh representation before respondent no. 3 within a period of four weeks from today and upon representation being received respondent no. 3 will verify the facts and forward the same before respondent no. 4 for releasing the amount of the petitioner. It further provided that as soon as respondent no. 1 gets recommendation made by respondent no. 3, he shall release the payment within further period of four weeks. October 10, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra ( Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) M/S Shree Nath Hotel .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad