W.P.No.8468 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.8468 of 2020 And W.M.P.No.10217 of 2020 G.Raji ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Thasildhar, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering in the petitioner's property in Dry S.No.109/1A – 0.08.0 hares (20 cents), Dry S.No.118/4B – 0.05.5 hares (13 ½ cents), Dry S.No.118/3 – 0.20.5 hares (50 ½ cents), Dry S.No.118/8A – 0.19.5 hares (48 cents), Dry S.No.118/1B – 0.0.35 hares (8 ½ cents), Dry No.118/2C – 0.11.0 hares (27 cents), Dry S.No.118/5 – 0.09.5 hares (23 cents), Dry S.No.118/7 – 0.08.0 hares (20 cents), Dry S.No.118/9B – 0.06.5 hares (16 cents) situate at Iynkonthamkothapalli Village, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8468 of 2020 For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering in the petitioner's property in Dry S.No.109/1A – 0.08.0 hares (20 cents), Dry S.No.118/4B – 0.05.5 hares (13 ½ cents), Dry S.No.118/3 – 0.20.5 hares (50 ½ cents), Dry S.No.118/8A – 0.19.5 hares (48 cents), Dry S.No.118/1B – 0.0.35 hares (8 ½ cents), Dry No.118/2C – 0.11.0 hares (27 cents), Dry S.No.118/5 – 0.09.5 hares (23 cents), Dry S.No.118/7 – 0.08.0 hares (20 cents), Dry S.No.118/9B – 0.06.5 hares (16 cents) situate at Iynkonthamkothapalli Village, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the subject property, however, his possession is frequently interfered by the respondents. The learned counsel further submitted that this Court may, without going into the merits of the case, permit the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court, if the respondents interfere with the petitioner's property in future. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8468 of 2020 3.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court for appropriate remedy. 4.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 15.10.2025 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Thasildhar, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8468 of 2020 M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri W.P.No.8468 of 2020 And W.M.P.No.10217 of 2020 15.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis