Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193685 (ALL)

TAHIR FARAZ @ TALHA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/23876/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23876 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Shivendra Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant and the learned AGA for the State. 2. Although prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report registered on 07.10.2025 as Case Crime No. 0105 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station - Mahila, District - Rampur but at the time when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioners confines his relief to grant of protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3. We have perused the the First Information Report which prima facie discloses cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 4. We are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all offences, mentioned in the present case, are punishable with a term up to 7 years, therefore, authorities are directed to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Bind, S. Kamal Akhtar Khan, Shikha Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Upadhyay, G.A., Shivendra Kumar Tahir Faraz @ Talha And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 6. It is expected of the Police not to harass the petitioners till the conclusion of the investigation in any manner whatsoever. However, the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 28, 2025 Rama Kant CRLP No. 23876 of 2025 2 (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad