Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.503 of 2025
IN TH 198
GIAN DEVI
Vs SH. ASHOK KUM
CORAM: HON'
Present: Mr.
Mr. S
for th
Mr. V
Mr. A
for th
HARKESH MAN
1.
Lear the contempt pr respondents, there
2.
Dism
3.
Rule
February 10, 202 Atik Whe Whe 025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.
Date of De
K KUMAR AND OTHERS
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Gagan, Advocate for Mr. Shrey Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate with Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for the respondents.
**** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner s pt proceedings have been sought, therefore, he does not press the prese Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged.
(HA , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable
Yes/N
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.503 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 10.02.2025
......Petitioner
....Respondents ESH MANUJA ioner submits that the order qua whic ought, stands complied with by th e present petition.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 a which by the MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.11 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment