HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9422 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for appellant, learned counsel for informant and the learned AGA for State. 2. This criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of The Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellant- Netrapal Alias Baba with the prayer to allow the appeal, set aside the bail rejection order dated 01.04.2025 passed by Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Special Judge (S.C/S.T. Act), Jalaun at Orai în Bail Application No. 52 of 2025 (Atal Singh and others vs. State of U.P.), arising from Case Crime No.11 of 2025, under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3), 352, 131,3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, at Police Station Churkhi, District Jalaun. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that co- accused namely Jaiveer Singh has been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 9.10.2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.3195 of 2025 (Jaiveer Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another), thus appellant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned AGA for State and the learned counsel for informant have strongly opposed the prayer for bail. 5. I have considered the rival submissions so made and have gone through the entire record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, the Court is of the opinion that the appellants have made out Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Raghuvansh Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Gaurav Singh Tomar Satyam Singh .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) a case for bail. 7. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the appellant is set-aside. 8. Let the appellant- Satyam Singh involved in Case Crime No.11 of 2025, under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3), 352, 131,3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, at Police Station Churkhi, District Jalaun, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The appellant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The appellant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The appellant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv) The appellant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v) The appellant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the concerned Court shall be at liberty to take appropriate coercive action for appearance of the accused or to cancel the bail granted. October 17, 2025 Mukesh CRLA No. 9422 of 2025 2 (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad