HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36234 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent no.1 and Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondents nos.2 and 3. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has submitted an application before the respondent authority for electricity connection in his residence namely ward no. 5 Shamsarpur (House No. 736) on 20.02.2025. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authority is sitting tight over the matter and is not issuing the electricity connection to the petitioner despite repeated representation made by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Executive Engineer, Dakshinanchal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Badan Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C. Ahmad Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Khand-I, Mainpuri, within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 17, 2025 Arif WRIC No. 36234 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad