2025:JHHC:21627 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3844 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3844 of 2025 ---- 1. Rukhsana Khatun, aged about 25 years, D/o Islam Sheikh 2. Sherun Bibi, aged about 50 years, W/o – Laskari Sheikh 3. Asma Bibi, aged about 35 years, W/o Laskari Sheikh 4. Saleha Bibi, aged about 40 years, W/o Ismail Sheikh 5. Hasina Bibi, aged about 40 years, W/o Islam Sheikh 6. Neha Pravin, aged about 29 years, W/o Azad Sheikh All are R/o Village – Narayanpur, PO and PS – Narayanpur, District – Jamtara, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate :- Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. K.K. Mishra, Advocate ---- 06/04.08.2025 Mr. K.K. Mishra, learned counsel submits that he is in receipt of vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. 2. Since the matter has been taken up, on the request of Mr. K.K. Mishra, learned counsel, the vakalatnama has been taken on record and he has been provided the liberty to argue the matter. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 4. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.35 of 2025, for the offence registered 2025:JHHC:21627 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3844 of 2025 under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 324(4), 334(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case. She submits that petitioner No.4 has lodged the FIR on the same day against the husband of the informant which was numbered as Narayanpur P.S. Case No.36 of 2025. She submits that all the petitioners herein are ladies and there are general and omnibus allegations against all of them. She further submits that there are direct allegation of assault against three persons and specific role is not described in the FIR so far the petitioners are concerned. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that it appears that there are series of case between the parties. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the Informant opposes the prayer and submits the incident took place only because of the petitioners herein and in view of that the anticipatory bail of petitioners may kindly be rejected. 8. Looking into the FIR it transpires that there are direct allegation of assault against co-accused persons namely Ismile Sheikh, Azad Sheikh and Laskari Sheikh and there are general and omnibus allegation so far these petitioners are concerned and all the petitioners are ladies and there are case and counter case, I am 2025:JHHC:21627 --3-- A.B.A. No. 3844 of 2025 inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 9. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.35 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Sections 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/