1 APHC010269922016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2990] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 27381/2016 Between: 1. SAMSONU KOTTURU,, S/O. SUNDARA RAO KOTTURU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS, R/O. RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SAMALKOT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SAMALKOT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent intentionally not conducting auction for slaughter house in Samalkot Municipal Corporation limits, to favour the local business men and allowing them to conduct slaughter unofficially, though notification was issued vide Proc. Roc.No.1023/2015-A1, dated: 26-2-2016, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct auction for slaughter 2 house in continuation of earlier cancelled notification in Roc.No.1023/2015-A1, dated: 26-2-2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 33914 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct auction for slaughter house in continuation of earlier cancelled notification in Roc.No.1023/2015-A1, dated: 26-2-2016, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P. No.27381 of 2016 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner(s), represented that in the light of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 2.07.2025 eha 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WP No.27381 of 2016 Date: 2.07.2025 eha U