Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193637 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34835/2025 · 2025-10-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34835 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. Heard Sri Ram Awadh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 to take action against the respondent no. 4, in accordance with the provisions of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 for the alleged embezzlement pointed out in his representation. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has not filed the requisite complaint supported with affidavit as contemplated under Rule 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997. In view of the aforesaid facts, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 2 in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid rules. October 7, 2025 Ranjeet Sahu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Ram Awadh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Rajendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad