Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6103 of 2025 Mohammad Hasim ….. Petitioner
Mr. Prakash Chandra Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others
.....
Opp. Parties
Mr. Asutosh Mohanty, Central Govt. Counsel (for opp. party no.1) Mr. Jateswar Nayak, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
ORDER 16.04.2025
02.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Mohammad Hasim, challenging the
order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the Arbitrator, L.A.N.H. -cum- Collector, Mayurbhanj in L.A. Arbitration case no.08 of 2022 vide Annexure-7 in dismissing the arbitration petition at the stage of admission.
After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the impugned order, there is an alternative remedy available in the Arbitration and Digitally Signed Signed by: RAJESH KUMAR BADHEI Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 17-Apr-2025 10:42:37 Signature Not Verified
Conciliation Act, 1996 and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition to approach the said authority.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge Rajesh