1 2025:CGHC:44714 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3254 of 2023 1 - Dr. Manju Koshle W/o Shri Vivek Chelkar Aged About 32 Years R/o P S City Road, Gali No. 1, Near Dhela Bai Sonkar Hostel, New Changora Bhata Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Livestock Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Veterinary Services, Indravati Bhawan, Block 3, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director Veterinary Services, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Dr. Rajendra Bhagat Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh 5 - Dr. Mukesh Kumar Lanjhekar S/o Shri Narad Ram Lanjhekar Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Raveli, Police Station Piparia, District - Kabirdham, Posted As Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Veterinary Hospital, Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Pallavi Tiwari Assistant Veterinary Field Officer, Veterinary ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 Hospital, Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 7 - Nain Singh Thakur S/o Shri Ram Singh Aged About 56 Years R/o Bairag Para, Police Station Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.), Posted As Dresser (Pattibandhak), Veterinary Hospital, Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 8 - P.D. Manikpuri S/o S.D Manikpuri Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No.12, Pandaria, Police Station Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh (Journalist) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anchal Kumar Matre, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 02.09.2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena