HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38159 of 2018 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is very fairly argued by Sri Pankaj Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner that his client is not responding. 2. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed in default. 3. It is made clear that in case, the petitioner is feeling aggrieved with this order, she has a liberty to file recall application within 30 days from today. October 13, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dur Vijay Singh, Maohammd Nadeem (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Huma Qamar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad