CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 1. Arun Kumar S/o.K.T.S.Mani, No.79, Mullai Nagar, Orikkai, Kancheepuram District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Superintendent of Police, Crimes Against Women and Children, Kancheepuram District. Thaiyar Kullam, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu 631 501. 2.Additional District Superintendent of Police (Crime against Women and Children), Kancheepuram District, Thaiyra Kullam, Kanchipuram, Tamilnadu 631501, Kancheepuram District. 3.A.Gowtham S/o.Arun Kumar, No.25B, Aladi Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Kancheepuram - 631501. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 582 of BNSS praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugn inquiry in Summons dated 14.11.2025 issued by the 2nd Respondent to the Petitioner and QUASH the same and pass such order or further orders. 1 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Purushothaman For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1& R2. ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the summons dated 14.11.2025 issued by the 2nd Respondent. 2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that summons has been issued to the petitioner for enquiry in respect of a complaint given by Gowtham/3rd respondent-de facto complainant born through the petitioner’s first wife; other than that, the respondents 1 and 2 are not harassing the petitioner and the summons cannot be quashed. 3. Ms.R.Madhubala, learned counsel filed vakalat for Respondent No.3. She would submit that the petitioner is 3rd respondent’s father and the petitioner was married to mother of the 3rd respondent and subsequently, he has married again. 2 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is true that the petitioner has married the mother of the 3rd respondent. However, divorce was granted 27 years ago. After getting a divorce from the Court, the petitioner has married for the 2nd time. In the family matter, the respondents 1 and 2 are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the 3rd respondent is repeatedly giving complaint against the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to enquire the matter and dispose of the same immediately in the manner known to law. 6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 04-12-2025 nvsri Neutral Citation:Yes/No 3 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Crimes Against Women and Children, Kancheepuram District. Thaiyar Kullam, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu 631 501. 2.The Additional District Superintendent of Police (Crime against Women and Children), Kancheepuram District, Thaiyra Kullam, Kanchipuram, Tamilnadu 631501, Kancheepuram District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 4 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. nvsri CRL OP No. 33079 of 2025 04-12-2025 5 / 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis