GOVIND SHARMA S/O MALIRAM SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6614/2025 · 2025-06-13
Anand Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23191] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6614/2025 Govind Sharma S/o Maliram Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Plot No. 31, Kumaharon Ka Mohalla, Village Nayan, Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur. Presently Police Station Harmada Jaipur. At Present Tenant At Factory Owner Plot No. 03, Chandija Nagar, Badharna, Vishvakarma, Police Station Vishavakarma, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khedar For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.S. Rathore, PP with Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 13/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 134/2025 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, District Jaipur City (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2) & 3(5) of BNS and Sections 63 & 65 of Copyright Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in the FIR, whereas he has not committed any offence whatsoever. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled against the accused- petitioner in FIR are triable by the Magistrate and co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 5549/2025, 5669/2025 & 5741/2025. Learned counsel also
[2025:RJ-JP:23191] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6614/2025] submits that charge-sheet has already been filed. Therefore, he is not required for any kind of custodial interrogation. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Govind Sharma S/o Maliram Sharma shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 134/2025 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, District Jaipur City (West) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court.
7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DIVYA /162