Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19351 (KAR)

SRI.SUSHRATH RUDRACHARI v. THE CHIEF MANAGER (GB)

WP/6885/2021 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:587 WP No. 6885 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6885 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SUSHRATH RUDRACHARI S/O LATE A.RUDRACHARI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2074, 24TH MAIN, SECTOR I, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 102. 2. SMT. SUSHMA.R W/O VINAY MAYANNA, D/O LATE A.RUDRACHARI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.536, 5TH B CROSS, 4TH MAIN, 4TH STAGE, BEML LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 098. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SANGEETHA.T.H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.AVINASH.B.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER (GB), STATE BANK OF INDIA, AO-I, BENGALURU, 1ST FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (B AND O), STATE BANK OF INDIA, AO-I, BENGALURU SOUTH R & DB, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:587 WP No. 6885 of 2021 1ST FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. 3. THE BANK MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, OFFICE AT 433, 27TH MAIN, SECTOR 1, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C.GURU., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Sangeetha.T.H., counsel on behalf of Sri.Avinash.B.C., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Smt.Sangeetha.T.H., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioners to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:587 WP No. 6885 of 2021 they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16