HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37498 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Santosh Tripathi, learned counsel for applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.230 of 2024, under Section 103(1) B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Bahadurgarh, District Hapur with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is the husband and has been falsely implicated in the present case owing to his relation with the deceased person. His wife has been put to death by some unknown person. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 02.12.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that the deceased has expired within the precincts of the house of the applicant, as such, he is not entitled for bail. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the deceased has expired within the precincts of house of the applicant and the cause of death is asphyxia as a result of ante-mortem strangulation, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mandvi Tripathi, Santosh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rinku Alias Ravindra Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 7. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously in view of the principle as has been laid down in the recent judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 and Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702, if there is no legal impediment. 8. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 29, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 37498 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad