DURENDRA BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
NA529/3786/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3786 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is informant in S.T. No. 289 of 2012. (State. Vs. Sanjay Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 256 of 2012, under sections 364, 302, 201, 34, 120-B, 147, 148 LP.C. and Section 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station- Kachhwa, District- Mirzapur which is pending in the Court of Learned Sessions Judge, Mirzapur. Learned counsel has submitted that the said case pending since 2012 and only two witnesses have been examined till date. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Magistrate to decide the said case as expeditiously as as possible.
3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the court below concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment.
4. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 14, 2025 Mukesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satish Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Durendra Bahadur Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad