Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19346 (GAU)

SARASWATI NAMO DAS v. PRADIP KUMAR NAMO DAS

I.A.(Civil)/3107/2025 · 2025-09-17

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010208472025 2025:GAU-AS:12897 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3107/2025 SARASWATI NAMO DAS W/O-BATACHU NAMO DAS. VILL- BUDUCHAR. P.O.- DALGOMA. P.S.- MATIA. DIST.- GOALPARA (ASSAM). PIN-783125. VERSUS PRADIP KUMAR NAMO DAS S/O- LATE GAGEN NAMO DAS. R/O- VILL- BUDUCHAR (JAYANTIPUR). P.O.- DALGOMA. P.S.- MATIA. DIST.- GOALPARA (ASSAM). 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIRPAR GUWAHATI- 37. 4:THE PRESIDENT GOALPARA ZILLA PARISHAD GOALPARA (ASSAM). 5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALPARA ZILLA PARISHAD GOALPARA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T BEGUM, MR. A ROSHID Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A M KHAN Linked Case : WP(C)/4371/2025 PRADIP KUMAR NAMO DAS S/OI LT GAGEN NAMO DAS VILL BUDUCHAR JAYANTIPUR PO DALGOMA PS MATIA DIST GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATGI 37 3:TRHE PRESIDENT GOALPARA ZILA PARISHAD GOALPARA ASSAM 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALPARA ZILLA PARISHAD GOALPARA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 18-09-2025 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. M. Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner. 2. This is an application praying for impleadment of the applicant as party respondent in the connected writ petition being WP(C)No.4371/2025. Page No.# 3/3 3. The opposite party/writ petitioner has challenged the Re-Tender Notice dated 25.07.2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Goalpara, on the ground that the opposite party/writ petitioner had participated in the first Tender dated 05.06.2025, in respect of the settlement of various Hats/Ghats/Fishery for a period w.e.f. 01.08.2025 to 30.06.2026, including Buduchar Daily Market under Goalpara Zila Parishad and without considering the eligibility of the opposite party/writ petitioner, the NIT dated 05.06.2025 has been cancelled arbitrarily. 4. The applicant claims to have participated in the Re-Tender dated 25.07.2025, in respect of the settlement of the Buduchar Daily Market under Goalpara Zila Parishad. 5. Having considered above, I am of the view that the applicant appears to be a necessary party and would be affected if the writ petition is allowed. Thus, the applicant is required to be impleaded as respondent No. 5 in the connected writ petition being WP(C)No.4371/2025. 6. Accordingly, the applicant is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No. 5, in the connected writ petition being WP(C)No.4371/2025. 7. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant