Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193444 (ALL)

BANARASI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIB/2607/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2607 of 2025 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Sri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, the Board of Revenue has passed the order, as such, no cause of action survives in the matter. 2. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 14, 2025 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kant Mishra, Vivek Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Banarasi And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad