VIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15384/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15384 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Prashant Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he is presently posted as a Head Constable in Jalaun, and seeks transfer to Ayodhya Range, as his wife is working as an Assistant Teacher in Azamgarh.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the petitioner shall be duly considered by Respondent No. 2 - Director General of Police/Inspector General of Police (Establishment) Head Quarter, Lucknow Tower-2, 4th Floor, Gomit Nagar, Lucknow.
4. Considering the submissions made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation, along with self-attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of this order before Respondent No. 2 on or before 07.11.2025.
5. Upon the said motion, Respondent No. 2 shall consider and decide the petitioner’s claim, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of two months thereafter. October 14, 2025 S.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Virendra Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad