1 ( 2025:HHC:22868 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.11175 of 2025 Decided on: 15.07.2025 Sadhu Ram ..…..Petitioner Versus HPSIDC Ltd. and others …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.I.N.Mehta, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General for respondents-State. Mr. Ankit Kaloti, Advocate for respondent- HPSIDC. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge ( Oral ) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that her client is ready to work at the site. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-HPSIDC states that his client has no objection to the same and as a matter of fact, the site has not been changed. 3. Be that as it may, since the petitioner is ready to execute the work in question, therefore, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondents not to create any hindrance in the work of the petitioner so as to enable him to complete the same in terms of the tender. This however shall be subject to the petitioner’s depositing the earnest money and the performance security, if the same stands released. Needful be done prior to the commencement of the work. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 15th July, 2025. (yogesh/pankaj)