RAVINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. RAHUL BHANDARI AND OTHERS
COCP/571/2025 · 2025-04-07
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19341 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19341 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.571 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 153
RAVINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS
RAHUL BHANDARI AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Ms. Inayat Khullar
for the petitioner
Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble vide order dated cases.
2.
In view of the above, the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned
3.
Disposed of
4.
Rule stands discharged.
April 07, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.571 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:
RAVINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS
Vs RAHUL BHANDARI AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Ms. Inayat Khullar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel informs that the order by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed in LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner t petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned
Disposed of being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.571 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2025
......Petitioners
....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. counsel informs that the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected
learned counsel for the petitioners does not press t petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned LPA. not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 passed Division Bench of this Court LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected does not press t petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.07 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment