Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1934 (UTT)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/139/2025 · 2025-02-17

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No. 139 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, AGA for the State. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 111 of 2024, under Sections 308(5), 351(3), 61(2), 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Kelakhera, District Udham Singh Nagar. State was required to get instructions. Today, learned State Counsel would give a statement that the applicant is not wanted at the stage of investigation. The Court takes on record the statement made by the learned State Counsel. Since, the applicant is not wanted in the case, there is no apprehension of his arrest. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 17.02.2025 Avneet/