Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1934 (CHH)

M/s Mihir Minerals v. Employees Provident Fund Organization

WPL/138/2016 · 2025-06-29

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 138 of 2016 1 - M/s Mihir Minerals Through Its Prop. Ajay Bajaj, Aged About 40 Years, S/o B.D. Bajaj, R/o Rajnedra Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahisl Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Employees Provident Fund Organization Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Regional Office At Block D Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Recovery Officer, And Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office Raipur, Office At Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Md. Ruhul Ameen Memon, Advocate along with Mr. Anurag Agrawal, Advocate For respondents : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30.06.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to challenge the order passed under Section 7-Q and 14-B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short ‘the Act of 1952’) before the appropriate Forum. REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner would be at liberty to prefer a writ petition against an order passed under the provisions of the Section 7-Q of the Act of 1952 and an appeal against an order passed under the provisions of Section 14-B of the Act of 1952. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha