RAVEESH KUMAR @ RAVEESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS
CRLP/16874/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193395 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193395 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16874 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following reliefs:-
" (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to 4 to make fair and proper investigation in Case Crime No.27 of 2025, under Section 310(2), 333, 115(2) 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Baldev, District Mathura by any Senior Officer of the concerned department except Police Station Baldev, District Mathura expeditiously within time bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature (ii) of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 and 4 to arrest the accused persons/respondent no.5 to 9 in Case Crime No.27 of 2025, under Section 310(2), 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Baldev, District Mathura 2 expeditiously within time bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record. 3. After some length of argument, Sri Rizwan Ahmad, learned A.G.A. submitted that in instant matter charge sheet has already been filed on 18.03.2025 and cognizance has also been taken by the Court concerned. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raveesh Kumar @ Raveesh Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been filed and cognizance has also been taken by the court concerned, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law.
October 14, 2025 AKT CRLP No. 16874 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad